This scratch provides that thievery is when a person who fraudulently and without claim of right takes whateverthing capable of being stolen, or fraudulently converts to the use of any person other than the general or special owner thereof anything capable of being stolen, is verbalise to steal that thing. In as much as theft is a major offence against property, it is to be noted that it is the slew surrounding a particular end or rather the facts of the case that will determine the liability to be incurred by the accused as theft is not the onl y offence against property. Therefore, havin! g gone finished or rather looked at the facts of Muleles case it is in spite of appearance my knowledge to submit that Muleles liability will not be of theft but of obtaining goods by false pretence. Citing the case of R v Chungu. Where, a attribute was made amidst theft and false pretence. In this case the accused was convicted of theft by trick, contrary...If you want to get a full essay, vagabond it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.