Rado emphasizes that Esperanto was invented to create residuum between people because of its simplicity and neutrality. He states that millions of people around the world has spoken Esperanto which is the language of peace. In addition, he provides nigh manifest evidences is that people who speak Esperanto in those countries much(prenominal) as Japan, Germany, Russia and Tanzania are punished which is challenging incline because of its past. In contradiction to Rado, Sola claims that Esperanto was created by a European which is imbalance for Asian people who want to study it.

He points out that native English speakers learn Esperanto only for six months, whereas Asian speakers spend image of that time.
The idea of Rado seems not persuasive enough compare to Sola. Firstly, Rado does not provide any examples or evidences to show the neutrality of Esperanto which he claims it to be the world second language. Furthermore, he fails to mention about the condition of the world language which Esperanto can achieve. A world language contains many area in society such as science, technology, culture, communication and so on. This means Esperanto must have some achievements to make it a world language. In tell to Rado, Solas statement is much more stronger when he claims that Asian seapkers are not equal to native...If you want to get a wax essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.